RR vs DC: IPL is the most popular cricket league in the world. In this, cricketers come on the field not only to play cricket but also to entertain people. One such interesting incident happened in the 9th match of IPL 2024, where the umpire rejected the LBW appeal against the ball of Khaleel Ahmed in the midst of a thrilling match between Rajasthan Royals and Delhi Capitals. After this, there was a conversation between Rishabh Pant and Khalil Ahmed about taking DRS and the video clip of this conversation is going viral on social media.
Khalil was asking for DRS
When Rajasthan was batting in the RR vs DC match, Dhruv Jurel was batting on the field in the 15th over of the innings. After Khalil’s ball hit Jurel’s pad on the very first ball of the over, the entire Delhi team appealed strongly, but the umpire rejected the appeal. But Khaleel felt that the ball had hit the pad directly, so he talked to Rishabh Pant and forced Rishabh to take DRS, but Rishabh believed that the ball had hit the bat first instead of the pad. This created a situation of confusion between the two players.
Funny dialogue of Khaleel Ahmed and Rishabh Pant
After Khaleel Ahmed bowls and the ball hits Dhruv Jurel’s pad, Rishabh comes to Pant and Khaleel puts pressure on the captain to take DRS, Khaleel says to Rishabh, ‘Take-le brother, take-le, this is the last one. …on which Rishabh says to Khalil, ‘It is not a matter of whether you will flow or not.’ Hearing this conversation between the two players, even the commentators start laughing.
After this funny incident, this video is going viral on social media. But even after so many efforts, Sudha Rishabh does not take DRS and the decision is proved correct and later he realizes that the ball first hit Jurel’s bat and then the pad.
On March 28, Delhi Capitals had to face defeat in the DC vs RR match. Rajasthan Royals defeated Delhi Capitals by 12 runs. In this, Rajasthan scored 185 runs in 20 overs but Delhi could score only 173 runs in the innings.
MLA Satej Patil commented on the exact dispute with MP Dhananjay Mahadik in Kolhapur Politics BJP Congress Lok Sabha Elections
Kolhapur: ABP Maja’s presentation “Jai Veeru in search of a constituency” reached Kolhapur today (29 March) in view of the Lok Sabha elections 2024. Kolhapur Congress District President and Congress Legislature Party leader MLA Satej Patil (Satejpatti on Dhananjay Mahadik) participated along with Jai Veeru. At this point Jai Veeru certainly tried to directly question Satej Patil on the dispute with his arch political rival Dhananjay Mahadik. This time Patil told for the first time what the controversy is about. Also told the background.
Speaking on this occasion, Satej Patil made an accurate comment on the controversy with Dhananjay Mahadik. Describing this dispute as political, he said that the context is of 2004. There is no personal dispute in this. During this, Patil said that this dispute started due to disagreement on political positions.
What did Satej Patil say?
He said that the dispute is about several elections. That history is of 2009, 2014, 2019. Kolhapur district has a history of many such elections. And so we Congress are fighting with one idea. This is their party and they are pushing their agenda. We as our party are trying to take our development agenda to Kolhapur.
People don’t like constant change
He further said that before this we were together in 2004. But at the end of the day in politics, sometimes the stakes are different. That’s why I can’t say publicly. I am moving forward with my role after the split. Because people do not like constant change. Therefore, I try to do social work and politics as per the role I have taken.
No personal dispute with Mahadik
At that time we also had Bullets, Yamahas and bicycles. Satej Patil recalled that we used to go to Kagling on bicycles to watch cricket matches. No personal dispute with Mahadik. He said that the dispute continued due to disagreement over the political situation.
Other important news
See more..